Skip to content
Free comparison framework

Cyber Insurance Comparison

Comparing two cyber-insurance carriers or quotes — Coalition vs AIG, Corvus vs Chubb, your renewal against a new quote? This is the neutral framework you pour your own quotes into. We assert no premiums or carrier statistics — you rate each option across the five dimensions that actually decide fit: coverage types, sublimits & waiting periods, claims support & IR panel, security prerequisites and total cost of risk. You get a weighted “which fits your risk profile better” readout, an overlaid radar, per-dimension bars and a side-by-side matrix you can export or share by permalink. It is a decision aid, not insurance or financial advice — get real quotes from the carriers and a licensed broker.

Weighted fit for your risk profile
Option A
0 / 100
Option B
0 / 100
Too close to call

On these weighted dimensions, Option A and Option B are effectively level (0 vs 0). The choice comes down to the specifics — compare the per-dimension bars below, and let price, claims references and the one or two coverages you most need break the tie.

0 / 56 ratings entered · weighting is a heuristic · figures are your own
CoverageSublimitsClaimsPrereqsCost
Option A Option B

Fit per dimension (0–100)

Fit by dimension

Coverage types · wt 260 vs 0
Sublimits & waiting periods · wt 200 vs 0
Claims support & IR panel · wt 220 vs 0
Security prerequisites · wt 180 vs 0
Total cost of risk · wt 140 vs 0

Coverage types · weight 26

Does the policy cover the losses that actually happen? Rate each quote on how well it covers the core insuring agreements — first-party and third-party, business interruption, ransomware/extortion, social-engineering fraud and dependent (vendor) outage. A cheaper quote that excludes your most likely loss is not cheaper.

0
0
cv1

First-party coverage — your own costs: breach response, forensics, data restoration, notification.

First-party covers what you spend on your own recovery; it is the most frequently used part of a cyber policy.

Option A
Option B
cv2

Third-party / liability coverage — claims from others: lawsuits, regulatory defence, PCI assessments.

Third-party covers what others claim from you; the size of these claims is why limits exist.

Option A
Option B
cv3

Business interruption (and system failure) — lost income while systems are down.

BI is often the largest dollar figure in a serious incident, yet the most unevenly covered between carriers.

Option A
Option B
cv4

Ransomware / cyber-extortion — ransom payments, negotiation and the incident around them.

Ransomware is the dominant loss driver; check it is covered in full, not carved out or heavily sublimited.

Option A
Option B
cv5

Social engineering / funds-transfer fraud — fraudulent-instruction and invoice-manipulation loss.

Social-engineering loss is common and is almost always a separate, often small, sublimited coverage.

Option A
Option B
cv6

Dependent / contingent business interruption — loss from a vendor or cloud provider outage.

A single cloud or SaaS outage can take you down without any breach of your own; dependent BI is how that is covered.

Option A
Option B
cv7

Regulatory defence & fines (where insurable), plus PR/reputational costs.

Regulatory action and reputational cost follow many breaches; coverage and insurability vary by jurisdiction.

Option A
Option B

Sublimits & waiting periods · weight 20

A policy limit you cannot reach is marketing. Rate how much of each coverage is actually available: ransomware and social-engineering sublimits, the business-interruption waiting period and indemnity period, contingent-BI sublimits, and whether the aggregate is adequate for your worst realistic loss.

0
0
sl1

Ransomware/extortion is at or near the full policy limit, not cut to a small sublimit.

A headline limit means little if ransomware — your most likely large loss — is capped at a fraction of it.

Option A
Option B
sl2

Social-engineering fraud sublimit is high enough for your realistic exposure.

Social-engineering sublimits are frequently low; confirm the cap matches the payments you could be tricked into making.

Option A
Option B
sl3

Business-interruption waiting period (hours before cover starts) is short enough to be useful.

A long waiting period can exclude most short-to-medium outages before BI cover ever engages.

Option A
Option B
sl4

BI indemnity / restoration period is long enough to cover a realistic recovery.

If the indemnity period is shorter than your real recovery time, income loss past that point is uninsured.

Option A
Option B
sl5

Contingent-BI and other sublimits (notification, PR, hardware "bricking") are adequate, not nominal.

The secondary sublimits are where quotes quietly diverge; a nominal sublimit is effectively no cover.

Option A
Option B

Claims support & IR panel · weight 22

In an incident you are buying a response, not a reimbursement form. Rate the breach-response panel and whether you can use your own counsel, the 24/7 hotline, the carrier's claims responsiveness, whether it runs an in-house incident-response capability, and how the retention/deductible works.

0
0
cl1

A pre-vetted breach-response / incident-response panel (forensics, legal, PR) is available and strong.

A ready panel gets qualified responders engaged in hours; assembling your own mid-incident costs critical time.

Option A
Option B
cl2

You can use your own choice of counsel / vendors (or add them to the panel) if you need to.

Panel-only policies can force you off trusted advisors; the ability to use your own counsel matters for some buyers.

Option A
Option B
cl3

A 24/7 incident hotline / first-notice-of-loss process exists and is easy to trigger.

The speed and ease of first notice shapes the whole claim; a clear 24/7 route is a real differentiator.

Option A
Option B
cl4

The carrier has a credible claims-paying and responsiveness track record (from your broker / references).

Claims reputation — do they pay fairly and fast — is the single thing you are ultimately buying; ask your broker for references.

Option A
Option B
cl5

The model fits you: in-house IR / active response vs pure reimbursement after you spend.

Some carriers run active, hands-on response; others reimburse. The right model depends on your own IR maturity.

Option A
Option B
cl6

Retention / deductible and any coinsurance are affordable and clearly understood.

The retention is what you pay before cover engages; a low premium with a punishing retention can be the worse deal.

Option A
Option B

Security prerequisites · weight 18

Carriers now require specific controls — and a control you warranted but do not actually have can void a claim. Rate how realistically you can meet and sustain each carrier's requirements: MFA, EDR, tested backups, email security and ongoing monitoring, without signing a warranty you cannot honour.

0
0
pr1

You can genuinely meet and evidence the MFA requirement (incl. remote access, email, privileged accounts).

MFA is the near-universal baseline; a gap between what you warrant and what you deploy is a coverage risk.

Option A
Option B
pr2

You can meet the EDR / endpoint-detection requirement across the required scope.

EDR is increasingly mandatory; confirm the coverage scope they require matches what you have deployed.

Option A
Option B
pr3

You can meet the tested, segregated/immutable backups requirement.

Backups requirements often specify testing and segregation; "we have backups" is not the same as meeting the warranty.

Option A
Option B
pr4

You can meet email-security and other specific control requirements (filtering, training, patching cadence).

Secondary control requirements vary by carrier and can be the deciding factor on eligibility and price.

Option A
Option B
pr5

You can sustain any ongoing monitoring / scanning the carrier runs or requires without surprises.

Some carriers scan you continuously; understand what they look at and how findings affect renewal before you bind.

Option A
Option B

Total cost of risk · weight 14

Compare the real economics, not just the premium line. Rate premium against the limit you get, the affordability of the retention, the value of any bundled services, how much sublimits and coinsurance erode the effective limit, and price stability — using the numbers from your own quotes.

0
0
tc1

Premium is reasonable for the limit and breadth actually provided (not just the cheapest number).

Compare premium per dollar of usable limit and coverage breadth; the lowest premium often buys the least cover.

Option A
Option B
tc2

The retention/deductible is affordable at the moment of a real claim.

A retention you cannot comfortably fund mid-incident undermines the whole policy; weigh it against the premium saving.

Option A
Option B
tc3

Bundled services (scanning, training, tabletop, threat intel) add real value you would otherwise buy.

Included services can offset cost — but only count them at the value you would actually have paid for them.

Option A
Option B
tc4

Sublimits and coinsurance do not quietly erode the effective limit you are paying for.

Effective limit = headline limit minus sublimit caps and coinsurance; this is the honest number to compare.

Option A
Option B
tc5

Price stability / renewal terms are predictable enough to plan around (per your broker).

A low first-year premium followed by a steep renewal is a different deal; ask about the renewal trajectory.

Option A
Option B

Get real quotes from the carriers

Links go to each carrier's own site. We assert no premiums, loss ratios or claims figures about any of them — fill this comparison in from the quotes you obtain through a licensed broker.

This is an educational comparison framework, not insurance or financial advice. The dimension weights are a transparent judgement framework for structured comparison, not a measurement, recommendation or guarantee of outcome. PlayCISO asserts no premiums, loss ratios, claims statistics or any other facts about any named carrier — every figure in this comparison comes from your own quotes, not from us. Obtain real quotes and advice from the carriers and a licensed broker. This tool performs no scan and runs entirely in your browser — nothing is uploaded. Your comparison is stored only in the shareable link you choose to copy.

TL;DR

What this framework is

  • A free, 100% in-browser framework for comparing TWO cyber-insurance carriers or quotes side by side — Coalition vs AIG, Corvus vs Chubb, your renewal vs a new quote, any pairing.
  • It is neutral by design. We assert NO premiums, loss ratios, claims statistics or any other facts about any carrier. You fill in a rating for each option from your own quotes; the tool does the weighing, not the inventing.
  • Five dimensions that actually decide fit: coverage types (first-party, third-party, BI, ransomware/extortion, social engineering, dependent BI), sublimits & waiting periods, claims support & incident-response panel, security prerequisites (MFA/EDR/backups the carrier requires), and total cost of risk.
  • Output: a weighted "which fits better for your risk profile" readout, an overlaid radar, per-dimension bars for both options, and a side-by-side matrix — with CSV/Markdown export and a base64url permalink so you can share the exact comparison with your broker or board.
  • This is NOT insurance or financial advice. Get real quotes from the carriers (linked to their own sites) and a licensed broker. Nothing is uploaded; your comparison lives only in the permalink you choose to copy.

Compare on what decides the outcome, not the premium line

Most “Coalition vs AIG” or “Coalition vs Corvus” searches end in a list of invented premiums and loss-ratio figures that cannot possibly be right for your business — your price depends on your revenue, industry, limits, retention and the controls you can evidence, and it changes every renewal cycle. So this tool does the opposite: it asserts nothing about any carrier and instead gives you the structure to compare the two quotes you actually hold. The dimensions are the ones that decide whether a policy helps you on your worst day: does it coveryour most likely losses, are the sublimits and waiting periodslow enough to leave the headline limit reachable, and is the claims response something you would want to be on the other end of at 2am?

Two dimensions people under-weight: security prerequisites and total cost of risk. Carriers now require specific controls — MFA, EDR, tested and segregated backups — and warranting a control you do not actually run can give an insurer grounds to dispute a claim, so the right question is not just “can I get the discount?” but “can I meet and sustain this honestly?” And the cheapest premium is frequently the worst deal once you account for a punishing retention, a ransomware sublimit well below the headline limit, or coinsurance that quietly erodes the cover. Rate each option, let the weighting surface the gaps, and take the exported side-by-side to your broker. The weights are a transparent heuristicfor a typical mid-market buyer — adjust your own emphasis as you read the bars. This is a decision aid, not advice, and it invents no figures.

Frequently asked questions

How does this cyber-insurance comparison work?

You name your two options — for example a Coalition quote and an AIG quote — then rate each one (Not offered / Limited / Adequate / Strong) across five weighted dimensions: coverage types, sublimits & waiting periods, claims support & incident-response panel, security prerequisites, and total cost of risk. The tool computes a weighted 0–100 "fit" score for each option, shows an overlaid radar and per-dimension bars, and tells you which fits your risk profile better — with the margin, so you know whether it is a clear win or too close to call. You fill it in from your own quotes; the framework does the weighing.

Does it tell me the premiums or compare Coalition vs AIG cost for me?

No, and that is deliberate. PlayCISO asserts no premiums, loss ratios, claims statistics or any other facts about any carrier — those change constantly, depend entirely on your revenue, industry, controls and limits, and inventing them would be worse than useless. This is the neutral framework you pour your own real quotes into. For "coalition vs aig" or "coalition vs corvus" the honest answer is: get both quotes through a broker, then compare them here on the dimensions that decide the outcome.

What do the five dimensions cover?

Coverage types checks the core insuring agreements — first-party, third-party/liability, business interruption, ransomware/extortion, social-engineering fraud, dependent (vendor) BI, and regulatory/PR. Sublimits & waiting periods check how much of that coverage is actually reachable. Claims support & IR panel checks the breach-response panel, choice of counsel, 24/7 hotline, claims track record and retention. Security prerequisites check whether you can realistically meet and sustain each carrier's required controls (MFA, EDR, tested backups) without warranting something you do not have. Total cost of risk checks premium against usable limit, retention affordability, bundled services and price stability.

Is this insurance or financial advice?

No. It is an educational decision-support framework only, not insurance or financial advice and not a recommendation of any carrier. The weights are a transparent heuristic you can disagree with, and the "fit" score reflects only how you rated each option. Obtain real quotes and advice from the carriers and a licensed insurance broker before you buy or renew.

Does it send my comparison anywhere?

No. Everything runs in your browser. It makes no API call and stores nothing on a server. Your comparison lives only in the shareable permalink you choose to copy (encoded in the URL) and in any Markdown or CSV file you export — useful for handing the same side-by-side to your broker, finance team or board.

This tool is free and always will be. Would a Pro workspace — saved designs, team sharing and exports — be worth paying for?

Show me Pro →No account needed to use this tool — this just tells us whether Pro is worth building out.
🎉 New here? Use code WELCOME10 for 10% off any plan at checkout
Cyber Insurance Comparison — Compare Carriers (Free Framework) · PlayCISO